When it comes to picking out a Christmas tree, some may wonder if it is better to go real or fake.
Regarding the environment, real trees hold the upper hand, as their overall carbon footprints are substantially lower. While fake trees are made of harmful plastics and metals, real trees spend their average 10 year lives taking in CO2 from the atmosphere. Though real trees protect wildlife habitat since they are often grown locally in areas that would otherwise be developed, a large majority of fake trees ship from overseas, increasing carbon emissions. Even so, people should keep in mind that in order to retain the environmental benefits of a real tree, it is important to buy from a sustainable farm and to ensure that it will be recycled in some way.
In terms of saving money, fake trees are the way to go, right? Many argue that even if a fake tree’s cost is higher upfront, it will eventually pay for itself after years of reuse. However, after a few years, many fake trees begin to shed and acquire a musty smell, leaving people with barren trees and an unpleasant scent in their living room.
The one category fake trees do win is convenience. Since real trees are still technically living, it is important to give them a continuous water source leading up to Christmas. On the other hand, fake trees are just that– fake, which means they will never require trimming and will always be a symmetrical shape. The challenges involved with tying a real tree to a car and setting it up at home may also be enough to steer somebody in the direction of purchasing a fake tree.
Overall, real trees seem to excel in nearly every category. The exceptions are if a low-cost option is needed short term or if transporting a real tree is out of the question. Regardless, everyone should make sure that whatever tree they decide on will fit their needs. After all, no matter what tree is chosen, it is sure to bring a smile on everyone’s faces this holiday season.